Incivility solutions

The author's involved tell us of the constant obstructions to rhetoric. Each has their own solutions to the problem. Followed by the large debate of gamergate and hate speeches, the issue is becoming larger as social media grows. Some solutions suggested are using words properly for what they mean and not for a concept or idea, Name calling should be abolished for its cruel acts and childish ways, and that it is possible to be wrong and debates are for instructing. These would reduce the amount of personal argument and focus on the facts. I believe that a great way to solve the rhetoric issue is to follow common sense etiquette. Is swearing, name calling, and arguing the reason for a debate? It should be to find a proper solution by discussing causes and effects whether negative or positive, and all possible outcomes.

essay 2 final

Jackson Barackman

RWS 200

Christoffer Werry

March 18, 2015

Demagoguery in Persuasion

Demagoguery is "polarizing propaganda that motivates members of an in group to hate and scapegoat some out group(s) largely by promising certainty, stability, and what Erich Fromm famously called 'an escape from freedom'"(Miller 462). Demagoguery can be found in many speeches and is a vital form of rhetoric. Patricia Robert Miller, author of "Democracy, Demagoguery and Critical Rhetoric", written in 2005, and published by Michigan State University Press, gives the reader the idea of "good public discourse" and demagoguery by illustrating how decision making and debating is affected by standards given to evaluate an argument. Robert Miller also uses secondary authors to help improve the description of the fallacies and techniques. LaPierre, spokesman for the NRA, gave a speech on December 21, 2012, discussing the shooting of an elementary school in Connecticut. LaPierre's speech discusses how we need an immediate fix for the issue to prevent shooting such as this from happening ever again. LaPierre's target audience was the parents and staff affected by the tragic event, but he also forced it towards all schools who do not have a security force on campus to protect staff and students. In this paper I will use the demagoguery standards mentioned by Robert Miller to evaluate the effectiveness of LaPierre's speech.

    Robert Miller introduces the idea of scapegoating as a way to cause blame on others. Robert Miller defines scapegoating “as denial through projection… Individuals (or communities) can deny responsibility for a situation by projecting that responsibility onto some outgroup. (Miller 464)” When La Pierre sees the blame of what happened to Sandy Hook Elementary is on the NRA, La Pierre scapegoats media and the government for the incident. La Pierre believes that with the violent media people are encouraged to take the actions such as what happened at Sandy Hook Elementary. He gives a list of several video games and movies that promote violence and the killing of children.  La Pierre explains

too many in our national media … their corporate owners … and their stockholders … act as silent enablers, if not complicit co-conspirators. Rather than face their own moral failings, the media demonize lawful gun owners, amplify their cries for more laws and fill the national debate with misinformation and dishonest thinking that only delay meaningful action and all but guarantee that the next atrocity is only a news cycle away. (LaPierre 4)

LaPierre believes that the acts at Sandy hook could have been avoided had it not been for the media and government. LaPierre scapegoats the media because of its violence with video games such as the video games: “Grand Theft Auto, Mortal Kombat and Splatterhouse. And here’s one: it’s called Kindergarten Killers. (LaPierre 2)” Some of the most violent games on the market available at almost any retail store. Kindergarten Killer, a lesser known video game, was found online by the NRA’s research department. LaPierre exclaims “…the media demonizes lawful gun owners…” and states that the media is “the filthiest form of pornography. (LaPierre 2)”

    Robert Miller explains that one form of demagoguery is having in groups and out groups. Robert defines in groups and out groups as “Our views of people like us (the ingroup) are nuanced and complicated, whereas we define the outgroup by one or two salient and generally negative features that we insist epitomize the entire group.” (Miller 463) By this statement Miller explains that the in group would be the group of people who agree with what you believe in and the outgroup is the opposing group. Miller goes on to say “there are some people whom we think of as “like us” in some important regard, and others who are very different from us in some equally important regard” (Miller 462), not discriminating either side, however showing that they are separate in important manors. In La Pierre’s article, La Pierre uses the media, government, and certain parts of society as the outgroup and ultimately scapegoats them for their disbelief in the shootings that occurred at the elementary school, Sandy Hook. La Pierre explains that the media is the “filthiest form of pornography” because of its constant violence. La Pierre also believes that the governments laws to control guns are not useful because they “refus[e] to create an active national database of the mentally ill[.]” (La Pierre 3) La Pierre believes that the NRA is a defender of the nation and gun rights. La Pierre believes the NRA is the ingroup and the out groups are media, government, and other opposing parties who blame the NRA for what happened at Sandy Hook Elementary.

    A fallacy as described by Robert Miller “...is wrong in the sense that it frustrates efforts to arrive at the resolution of a dispute.” They set out ten rules of discourse.” La Pierre uses the media as one of those ten rules, this one being straw man. He lists multiple violent video games, saying

Through vicious, violent video games with names like Bulletstorm, Grand Theft Auto, Mortal Kombat and Splatterhouse. And here’s one: it’s called Kindergarten Killers. It’s been online for 10 years. How come  my research department could find it and all of yours either couldn’t or didn’t want anyone to know you had found it? (La Pierre 3)

La Pierre essentially creates the media to be an object to attack because of how easy it is to blame them. Video games and other media are, as LaPierre would say, the source of motivism for the shooting. Robert Miller describes straw man as making a point that is undefendable from the other side of the argument. La Pierre points out that maybe the shooting at Sandy Hook may not have happened had the motivators for the shooter had been accessible. LaPierre’s use of the straw man should weaken his effectiveness, but in this case it gives the media no way to defend itself, giving LaPierre the upper hand on the situation.

In Conclusion, Robert Miller shows us the techniques that were used in La Pierre’s speech and gives us a good definition of how demagoguery was used in La Pierre’s speech. La Pierre’s speech was meant to motivate the correct actions to be taken to control events such as the Sandy Hook Elementary shooting. I have learned that demagoguery is highly negative but can be used in a positive way to motivate others. Demagoguery is a strong form of persuasion. I believe that La Pierre’s speech was to show the problem that was presented to many the day of the shooting. Robert Miller’s demagoguery rules help the listener, or audience, understand that La Pierre wants to be a problem solver in a strict way. To improve La Pierre’s speech, instead of scapegoating other medias, La Pierre should pay more attention to his audience and realize many may be offended by what he says. I do, however, agree with his argument that the NRA is not to blame for the actions of that day. Instead of a scapegoat he should offer a proposal to help everyone understand gun safety and protection of others. LaPierre’s use of the straw man may have strengthened his argument by not giving the media a way to defend themselves from his criticism. LaPierre’s speech was effective because it gave no one a defense, however LaPierre did not view others opinions and tackle the oppositions.

References

Roberts-Miller, Patricia. "Democracy, Demagoguery, and Critical Rhetoric." Rhetoric & Public       Affairs 8.3 (2005): 459-76. Web.

"Transcript of NRA's LaPierre's Speech on Newtown Massacre." TBO.com. N.p., 20 Dec. 2012.         Web.

Rough draft (full)

Jackson Barackman

RWS 200

Christoffer Werry

March 11, 2015

Demagoguery is "polarizing propaganda that motivates members of an in group to hate and scapegoat some out group(s) largely by promising certainty, stability, and what Erich Fromm famously called 'an escape from freedom'"(Miller 462). Patricia Robert Miller, author of "Characteristics of Demagoguery", gives the reader the idea of "good public discourse" by illustrating how decision making and debating is affected by standards given to evaluate an argument. LaPierre, spokesman for the NRA, gave a speech in 2012 discussing the shooting of an elementary school in Connecticut. LaPierre's speech discusses how we need an immediate fix for the issue to prevent shooting such as this from happening ever again. LaPierre's target audience was the parents and staff affected by the tragic event, but he also forced it towards all schools who do not have a security force on campus to protect staff and students. In this paper I will use the demagoguery standards mentioned by Robert Miller to evaluate the effectiveness of LaPierre's speech.

    Robert Miller introduces the idea of scapegoating as a way to cause blame on others. Robert Miller defines scapegoating

as denial through projection. Tsesis has said,“A racist society may actually promote bigotry in order to unite ingroup members and distract them from real political and economic problems by sacrificing a historical scapegoat. Intragroup conflict is diffused by focusing anger on a common target.” Individuals (or communities) can deny responsibility for a situation by projecting that responsibility onto some outgroup. (Miller 464)

When La Pierre sees the blame of what happened to Sandy Hook Elementary is on the NRA, La Pierre scapegoats media and the government for the incident. La Pierre believes that with the violent media people are encouraged to take the actions such as what happened at Sandy Hook Elementary. He gives a list of several video games and movies that promote violence and the killing of children.  La Pierre explains

too many in our national media … their corporate owners … and their stockholders … act as silent enablers, if not complicit co-conspirators. Rather than face their own moral failings, the media demonize lawful gun owners, amplify their cries for more laws and fill the national debate with misinformation and dishonest thinking that only delay meaningful action and all but guarantee that the next atrocity is only a news cycle away. (LaPierre 4)

La Pierre believes that the acts at Sandy hook could have been avoided had it not been for the media and government. La Pierre scapegoats both the media and government to persuade the audience to his side of the argument and take control of the debate.

    Robert Miller explains that one form of demagoguery is having in groups and out groups. Robert defines in groups and out groups as “Our views of people like us (the ingroup) are nuanced and complicated, whereas we define the outgroup by one or two salient and generally negative features that we insist epitomize the entire group.” (Miller 463) By this statement Miller explains that the in group would be the group of people who agree with what you believe in and the outgroup is the opposing group. Miller goes on to say “there are some people whom we think of as “like us” in some important regard, and others who are very different from us in some equally important regard” (Miller 462), not discriminating either side, however showing that they are separate in important manors. In La Pierre’s article, La Pierre uses the media, government, and certain parts of society as the outgroup and ultimately scapegoats them for their disbelief in the shootings that occurred at the elementary school, Sandy Hook. La Pierre explains that the media is the “filthiest form of pornography” because of its constant violence. La Pierre also believes that the governments laws to control guns are not useful because they “refus[e] to create an active national database of the mentally ill[.]” (La Pierre 3) La Pierre believes that the NRA is a defender of the nation and gun rights. La Pierre believes the NRA is the ingroup and the out groups are media, government, and other opposing parties who blame the NRA for what happened at Sandy Hook Elementary.

    Motivism can be described as a piece of demagoguery that is the influence of others to cause situations such as the one at Sandy Hook Elementary. La Pierre speaks of the media that becomes a motivator for many of the shootings that happen today. He lists multiple violent video games, saying

Through vicious, violent video games with names like Bulletstorm, Grand Theft Auto, Mortal Kombat and Splatterhouse. And here’s one: it’s called Kindergarten Killers. It’s been online for 10 years. How come  my research department could find it and all of yours either couldn’t or didn’t want anyone to know you had found it? (La Pierre 3)

La Pierre essentially scapegoats video games and other media as the source of motivism for the shooting. Robert Miller describes motivism as the in groups source to argue, or reason to take action. La Pierre points out that maybe the shooting at Sandy Hook may not have happened had the motivators for the shooter had been accessible.

In Conclusion, Robert Miller shows us the techniques that were used in La Pierre’s speech and gives us a good definition of how demagoguery was used in La Pierre’s speech. La Pierre’s speech was meant to motivate the correct actions to be taken to control happening such as the Sandy Hook Elementary shooting. I have learned that demagoguery is highly negative but can be used in a positive way to motivate others. Demagoguery is a strong form of persuasion. I believe that La Pierre’s speech was to show the problem that was presented to many the day of the shooting. Robert Miller’s demagoguery rules help the listener, or audience, understand that La Pierre wants to be a problem solver in a strict way. To improve La Pierre’s speech, instead of scapegoating other medias, La Pierre should pay more attention to his audience and realize many may be offended by what he says. I do, however, agree with his argument that the NRA is not to blame for the actions of that day. Instead of a scapegoat he should offer a proposal to help everyone understand gun safety and protection of others.

4 pragraph rough draft

Demagoguery is "polarizing propaganda that motivates members of an in group to hate and scapegoat some out group(s) largely by promising certainty, stability, and what Erich Fromm famously called 'an escape from freedom'"(Miller 462). Patricia Robert Miller, author of "Characteristics of Demagoguery", gives the reader the idea of "good public discourse" by illustrating how decision making and debating is affected by standards given to evaluate an argument. LaPierre, spokesman for the NRA, gave a speech in 2012 discussing the shooting of an elementary school in Connecticut. LaPierre's speech discusses how we need an immediate fix for the issue to prevent shooting such as this from happening ever again. LaPierre's target audience was the parents and staff affected by the tragic event, but he also forced it towards all schools who do not have a security force on campus to protect staff and students. In this paper I will use the demagoguery standards mentioned by Robert Miller to evaluate the effectiveness of LaPierre's speech.

Robert Miller introduces the idea of scapegoating as a way to cause blame on others. Robert Miller defines scapegoating

as denial through projection. Tsesis has said,“A racist society may actually promote bigotry in order to unite ingroup members and distract them from real political and economic problems by sacrificing a historical scapegoat. Intragroup conflict is diffused by focusing anger on a common target.” Individuals (or communities) can deny responsibility for a situation by projecting that responsibility onto some outgroup. (Miller 464)

When La Pierre sees the blame of what happened to Sandy Hook Elementary is on the NRA, La Pierre scapegoats media and the government for the incident. La Pierre believes that with the violent media people are encouraged to take the actions such as what happened at Sandy Hook Elementary. He gives a list of several video games and movies that promote violence and the killing of children.  La Pierre explains

too many in our national media … their corporate owners … and their stockholders … act as silent enablers, if not complicit co-conspirators. Rather than face their own moral failings, the media demonize lawful gun owners, amplify their cries for more laws and fill the national debate with misinformation and dishonest thinking that only delay meaningful action and all but guarantee that the next atrocity is only a news cycle away. (LaPierre 4)

La Pierre believes that the acts at Sandy hook could have been avoided had it not been for the media and government. La Pierre scapegoats both the media and government to persuade the audience to his side of the argument and take control of the debate.

    Robert Miller explains that one form of demagoguery is having in groups and out groups. Robert defines in groups and out groups as “Our views of people like us (the ingroup) are nuanced and complicated, whereas we define the outgroup by one or two salient and generally negative features that we insist epitomize the entire group.” (Miller 463) By this statement Miller explains that the in group would be the group of people who agree with what you believe in and the outgroup is the opposing group. Miller goes on to say “there are some people whom we think of as “like us” in some important regard, and others who are very different from us in some equally important regard” (Miller 462), not discriminating either side, however showing that they are separate in important manors. In La Pierre’s article, La Pierre uses the media, government, and certain parts of society as the outgroup and ultimately scapegoats them for their disbelief in the shootings that occurred at the elementary school, Sandy Hook. La Pierre explains that the media is the “filthiest form of pornography” because of its constant violence. La Pierre also believes that the governments laws to control guns are not useful because they “refus[e] to create an active national database of the mentally ill[.]” (La Pierre 3) La Pierre believes that the NRA is a defender of the nation and gun rights. La Pierre believes the NRA is the ingroup and the out groups are media, government, and other opposing parties who blame the NRA for what happened at Sandy Hook Elementary.

    Motivism can be described as a piece of demagoguery that is the influence of others to cause situations such as the one at Sandy Hook Elementary. La Pierre speaks of the media that becomes a motivator for many of the shootings that happen today. He lists multiple violent video games, saying

Through vicious, violent video games with names like Bulletstorm, Grand Theft Auto, Mortal Kombat and Splatterhouse. And here’s one: it’s called Kindergarten Killers. It’s been online for 10 years. How come  my research department could find it and all of yours either couldn’t or didn’t want anyone to know you had found it? (La Pierre 3)

La Pierre essentially scapegoats video games and other media as the source of motivism for the shooting. Robert Miller describes motivism as the in groups source to argue, or reason to take action. La Pierre points out that maybe the shooting at Sandy Hook may not have happened had the motivators for the shooter had been accessible.

Intruduction Essay 2

Demagoguery is "polarizing propaganda that motivates members of an in group to hate and scapegoat some out group(s) largely by promising certainty, stability, and what Erich Fromm famously called 'an escape from freedom'"(Miller 462). Patricia Robert Miller, author of "Characteristics of Demagoguery", gives the reader the idea of "good public discourse" by illustrating how decision making and debating is effected by standards given to evaluate an argument. LaPierre, spokesman for the NRA, gave a speech in 2012 discussing the shooting of an elementary school in Connecticut. LaPierre's speech discusses how we need an immediate fix for the issue to prevent shooting such as this from happening ever again. LaPierre's target audience was the parents and staff effected by the tragic event, but he also forced it towards all schools who do not have a security force on campus to protect staff and students. In this paper I will use the demagoguery standards mentioned by Robert Miller to evaluate the effectiveness of LaPierre's speech.

Robert-Millers evaluation

demagoguery- "polarizing propaganda that motivates members of an in group to hate and scapegoat some out group(s) largely by promising certainty, stability, and what Erich Fromm famously called 'an escape from freedom'"(Miller 462)
scapegoating-  "'denial through projection'"(Miller 464)
polarization- The opposite perception of a situation
"simple solutions"- eliminate out groups, promote in groups
victimization- use an existing perception to change the mind of others
in-group/out-group thinking- people who believe the same as us/differently than us

Creating out groups is what happens when you make scapegoating and polarization. "Parties must not prevent each other from advancing standpoints or casting doubt on standpoints." This violates the standards of discourse because it prevents solution and causes greater problems. LaPierre's document conforms to the discourse such that he describes the news as misattributing an argument and blaming others for one persons actions. LaPierre's document resembles discourse in that one must defend their argument with relevant information. LaPierre uses the example of other recent shootings to describe the actions of others.